The Community Engine Blog
News, tools, and analysis for innovating in the information economy
« MBA Bootcamp Changes Local Web Search Landscape | | Veg-o-matic: An alpha web service using xFolk »
spam is automating the social without the social
It's interesting to me that you can set up a mechanism for social interaction, use it, and then discover that voila, you have search visibility.
Sections: Emerging Practice
Topics: HighOctaneBlogging search technorati aggregation pubsub SEM/O spam
Richard MacManus makes an interesting tie between blogging for business visibility and spam in referring to our recently reported bootcamp experience:
This is what could be termed The Good Side of blogs for businesses. The Dark Side is the spam and fake blogs I wrote about above. It seems to be relatively easy nowadays for both sides to gain search engine ascendancy over old-school websites.
Read/Write Web: Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 8-14 August 2005
Well, I'm glad to be on the good side, but I wonder what that really means? Where did that comparison to spam come in?
I think it kind of boils down to this. Blogging is social communication on automation steroids. People mistrust the automation steroids part. When they see you exploring the boundaries of what technology steroids can do, well they sort of wonder about your motives. Or they discount what you are doing as manipulation.
Well no, but I do tend to be rather detached from potential consequences when looking at and explaining the mechanics of social interaction. It's interesting to me that you can set up a mechanism for social interaction, use it, and then discover that voila, you have search visibility.
It doesn't take a lot of expertise either. You do not have to purchase an expensive, search optimized blogging platform. All you have to do is get a blog, ping services like technorati and pubsub when you update, and link. Spammers essentially do away with the blog part and just pump out meaningless content.
In other words, spammers automate the social without the social. That's not what we did here, but we did focus on the automation part.
Bud posted this on August 16, 2005
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://thecommunityengine.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fpgibson/thecommunityengine.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/695